On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 7:11 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 19/02/2022 21:33, Rob Clark wrote:
> > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Avoid going down devfreq paths on devices where devfreq is not
> > initialized.
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c
> > index 9bf319be11f6..26a3669a97b3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c
> > @@ -83,12 +83,17 @@ static struct devfreq_dev_profile msm_devfreq_profile = {
> > static void msm_devfreq_boost_work(struct kthread_work *work);
> > static void msm_devfreq_idle_work(struct kthread_work *work);
> >
> > +static bool has_devfreq(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > +{
> > + return !!gpu->funcs->gpu_busy;
>
> I see that devfreq init will be skipped if gpu_busy is NULL.
> Can we use gpu->devfreq instead of this condition?
We could, but then we couldn't also use the same has_devfreq() helper
in msm_devfreq_init(). I thought it was clearer to use the same
helper everywhere.
> I noticed that you have replaced some of gpu->devfreq checks with
> has_devreq() calls. Is there any difference?
It amounts to the same thing because if you don't have gpu_busy, then
devfreq is never initialized. I just thought it clearer to use the
same check in all places.
BR,
-R
> > +}
> > +
> > void msm_devfreq_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > {
> > struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
> >
> > /* We need target support to do devfreq */
> > - if (!gpu->funcs->gpu_busy)
> > + if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
> > return;
> >
> > dev_pm_qos_add_request(&gpu->pdev->dev, &df->idle_freq,
> > @@ -149,6 +154,9 @@ void msm_devfreq_cleanup(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > {
> > struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
> >
> > + if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
> > + return;
> > +
> > devfreq_cooling_unregister(gpu->cooling);
> > dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&df->boost_freq);
> > dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&df->idle_freq);
> > @@ -156,16 +164,24 @@ void msm_devfreq_cleanup(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> >
> > void msm_devfreq_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > {
> > - gpu->devfreq.busy_cycles = 0;
> > - gpu->devfreq.time = ktime_get();
> > + struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
> >
> > - devfreq_resume_device(gpu->devfreq.devfreq);
> > + if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + df->busy_cycles = 0;
> > + df->time = ktime_get();
> > +
> > + devfreq_resume_device(df->devfreq);
> > }
> >
> > void msm_devfreq_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > {
> > struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
> >
> > + if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
> > + return;
> > +
> > devfreq_suspend_device(df->devfreq);
> >
> > cancel_idle_work(df);
> > @@ -185,6 +201,9 @@ void msm_devfreq_boost(struct msm_gpu *gpu, unsigned factor)
> > struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
> > uint64_t freq;
> >
> > + if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
> > + return;
> > +
> > freq = get_freq(gpu);
> > freq *= factor;
> >
> > @@ -207,7 +226,7 @@ void msm_devfreq_active(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > struct devfreq_dev_status status;
> > unsigned int idle_time;
> >
> > - if (!df->devfreq)
> > + if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
> > return;
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -253,7 +272,7 @@ void msm_devfreq_idle(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > {
> > struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
> >
> > - if (!df->devfreq)
> > + if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
> > return;
> >
> > msm_hrtimer_queue_work(&df->idle_work, ms_to_ktime(1),
>
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
