[RFC PATCH] drm/msm/dpu1: Add a common DPU1 compatible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There is *almost no reason* to keep separate compatibles for different
SoCs utilizing the DPU1 driver, as it checks the HW version at runtime.

Introduce a common compatible, while not removing the old ones to keep
old DT compatibility.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Bar some very very very unlikely edge cases (such as need for some random
quick being applied to one SoC from a family that shares DPU hw rev, but
not the others, there is little to no reason to keep adding compatibles
that don't mean anything.

If this change is cool, then the question about what to do with
dt-bindings arises...

 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
index 47fe11a84a77..335018542a3a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
@@ -1348,6 +1348,9 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops dpu_pm_ops = {
 };
 
 const struct of_device_id dpu_dt_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,dpu1" },
+
+	/* Legacy compatibles for old DTs */
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-dpu", },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-dpu", },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-dpu", },
-- 
2.35.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux