Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] arm64: dts: ti: use 'freq-table' in UFS node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/02/2022 14:13, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 19:45-20220219, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The 'freq-table-hz' property is deprecated by UFS bindings.
>> The uint32-array requires also element to be passed within one <> block.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi
>> index 599861259a30..c3afef0321ae 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi
>> @@ -1257,7 +1257,9 @@ ufs@4e84000 {
>>  			compatible = "cdns,ufshc-m31-16nm", "jedec,ufs-2.0";
>>  			reg = <0x0 0x4e84000 0x0 0x10000>;
>>  			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> -			freq-table-hz = <250000000 250000000>, <19200000 19200000>, <19200000 19200000>;
>> +			freq-table = <250000000 250000000
> 
> <min max> is much more readable and less error prone in case of a large
> set.

Pairs are easily visible if split per line, so readability is similar.
Not much is lost.

> 
>> +				      19200000 19200000
>> +				      19200000 19200000>;
> 
> are you sure the removal of the tuple adds value?

DT schema requires it, or rather: I do not know how to express uint32
tuples in DT schema. All my tries failed.


Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux