Re: [PATCH 0/9] i2c: qcom-cci: fixes and updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Wolfram,

On 2/11/22 7:49 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Hi,

The new bus adapter specific bus_regulator from commit 5a7b95fb993e
("i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter") is reused,

Reusing is nice, of course, but I hope you noticed that I needed to
revert this feature:

a19f75de73c2 ("Revert "i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter"")

yes, I've seen it, and as far as I understand it's expected to get it
back after the regression fixes.

The thread to get it re-applied is currently here:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220106122452.18719-1-wsa@xxxxxxxxxx/


A presented change in the series is I2C controller specific, so it works well
on top of the reverted feature, however it has a potential to be simplified
after the re-application.

Wolfram, can you please share your opinion on device tree binding name and
placement for an SDA/SDC pull-up controlled by a regulator?

See https://lore.kernel.org/all/682b7ffe-e162-bcf7-3c07-36b3a39c25ab@xxxxxxxxxx

Thank you in advance.

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux