Hi,
> Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 1/14/22 09:29, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> Hi Felipe,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:21 AM Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >>>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 4:03 PM Jarrett Schultz
> <jaschultzms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>> Since the Surface XBL Driver does not depend on ACPI, the
> >>>>> platform/surface directory as a whole no longer depends on ACPI.
> >>>>> With respect to this, the ACPI dependency is moved into each
> >>>>> config that depends on ACPI individually.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jarrett Schultz <jaschultz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 272479928172edf0
> ("platform:
> >>>> surface: Propagate ACPI Dependency").
> >>>>
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/platform/surface/Kconfig
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/surface/Kconfig
> >>>>> @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
> >>>>>
> >>>>> menuconfig SURFACE_PLATFORMS
> >>>>> bool "Microsoft Surface Platform-Specific Device Drivers"
> >>>>> - depends on ACPI
> >>>>> default y
> >>>>> help
> >>>>> Say Y here to get to see options for platform-specific
> >>>>> device drivers
> >>>>
> >>>> Without any dependency, all users configuring a kernel are now
> >>>> asked about this. Is there any other platform dependency that can
> >>>> be used instead?
> >>>
> >>> there's probably no symbol that would be true for x86 and arm64
> >>> while being false for everything else. Any ideas?
> >>
> >> depends on ARM64 || X86 || COMPILE_TEST?
> >
> > That sounds reasonable to me, I would be happy to take a patch for that.
>
> fair enough, let's see what Jarrett replies
>
> --
> Balbi
Sounds good to me, I'll include this in the next patch version. Thank you for pointing this out.
-Jarrett
