On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:38:29 +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> v2:
> * Fixed the wrong assumption in v1 that only sdm845 needed mx to be
> parent of cx, turned out all existing upstream SoCs need it except sc7280
> * Added another cleanup patch to sort power-domain defines and lists in
> alphabetical order as suggested by Matthias
>
> Mostly cleanups, with a fixup to remove the parent/child relationship
> across mx/cx for sc7280 SoC.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/3] soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Rename rpmhpd struct names
commit: 8f3d4dd65abd03a5edcf7b5d5a7a3e2a4866db15
[2/3] soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Remove mx/cx relationship on sc7280
commit: 65e7b31cc48581e32bee4546b59cea404252a138
[3/3] soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Sort power-domain definitions and lists
commit: 8beb290d17f280f690857897af11dc90ac2e1f3d
Best regards,
--
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
