Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This comes from the request of having everything as a module, to reduce the
> size of the multi-platform ARM builds. I would say that the important part
> related to that would be to keep the platform specific tables in modules.
>
> But keeping these parts as modules would still mean that it's a module that
> install the chained irq handler.

Yeah that is a bit of double-command is it not :-)

> @Linus, I'm not sure about what should be module and not in pinctrl, but this
> part of pinctrl-msm is less important then the others to be able to be compiled
> as a module.
>
> FWIW;
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Well we can't export that function in the rc series so I applied
this patch for fixes with your review tag.

We can discuss making chained IRQ handlers in modules
for the next merge window...

Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux