On 01/06/14 03:50, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> On 12/24, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:46:00PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>
>>>> +int ssbi_reg_read(void *context, unsigned int reg, unsigned int *val)
>>>> +{
>>>> + *val = 0;
>>>> + return ssbi_read(context, reg, (u8 *)val, 1);
>>>> +}
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ssbi_reg_read);
>>>> +
>>>> +int ssbi_reg_write(void *context, unsigned int reg, unsigned int val)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return ssbi_write(context, reg, (u8 *)&val, 1);
>>>> +}
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ssbi_reg_write);
>>> Not a big deal but could these just be inlined in the headers?
>> Sure, I can do that if I need to resend? The only benefit I see
>> is two less symbols exported.
> Yes please. After this review.
>
Ok done. Just waiting for you to reply on patch 3 until I resend.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
