On Friday 20 December 2013, David Brown wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt.c
> index 16e6183..1f11d93 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,16 @@ static const char * const msm_dt_match[] __initconst = {
> NULL
> };
>
> +static const char * const apq8074_dt_match[] __initconst = {
> + "qcom,apq8074-dragonboard",
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> DT_MACHINE_START(MSM_DT, "Qualcomm MSM (Flattened Device Tree)")
> .smp = smp_ops(msm_smp_ops),
> .dt_compat = msm_dt_match,
> MACHINE_END
> +
> +DT_MACHINE_START(APQ_DT, "Qualcomm MSM (Flattened Device Tree)")
> + .dt_compat = apq8074_dt_match,
> +MACHINE_END
> --
Why can't you reuse the MSM_DT definition and just add the dragonboard
to the list of compatible machines? The presence of the smp_ops pointer
should not matter if you don't support SMP.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
