On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 23:54 +0100, Stephen Warren wrote: > Indeed, I tend to think that reg-names is a bad idea. > > IIRC, the rule for "reg" is that entries must always have a defined > order, so that it can always be accessed by integer index. First time I hear about that rule, really... > And given > that's true, allowing for reg-names just creates confusion since it > implies you can look up the index in reg-names and then read reg at that > index. I actually believe that named resources leave less are for error than indexed ones. And this is the message I remember being "spread" in the times of static platform devices. Pawel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
