Re: [PATCH 7/7] usb: phy: msm: Lindent the code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, 

On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 15:22 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:27:44PM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I really don't like blind Lindent patches... sometimes it makes things
> even worse.

It is not exactly blindly. I have removed some of the changes in the
platform_driver structure. 

> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c |   99 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c
> > index 6d05085..111f454 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c
> > @@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ static int msm_hsusb_init_vddcx(struct msm_otg *motg, int init)
> >  
> >  	if (init) {
> >  		ret = regulator_set_voltage(motg->vddcx,
> > -				USB_PHY_VDD_DIG_VOL_MIN,
> > -				USB_PHY_VDD_DIG_VOL_MAX);
> > +					    USB_PHY_VDD_DIG_VOL_MIN,
> > +					    USB_PHY_VDD_DIG_VOL_MAX);
> 
> like here, what's the point ?

It makes indentation the same like the majority of the code.
I could drop this patch if you like.

Thanks,
Ivan


> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux