Hi John,
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:53:04AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> On 06/04/2013 09:09 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:19:48AM +0100, John Stultz wrote:
> >>On 06/01/2013 11:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>>This is mostly a resend of a patch series I sent a little over a month
> >>>ago. I've reordered the patches so that John can pick up the first three
> >>>and get a generic sched_clock layer without having to take the 64 bit
> >>>patches. The last three patches add 64 bit support and move the architected
> >>>timers on ARM64 and ARM to use it.
> >>
> >>Yea, so from the initial look over it, I think I'm happy with queuing
> >>the first three patches, although I'd like to get some acks from arm
> >>folks on at least the first two, just so no one is surprised with it
> >>going through the -tip tree.
> >The first two patches are pretty simple so, FWIW, you can add my ack on those:
> >
> > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> Thanks! Added to the commits.
What is the status of this series then? Is there a chance of seeing it in
3.11? I want to base some xtensa architecture work on this, so I'd like to
know whether there is a stable base to start from.
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@xxxxxxxxxx - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
