On 5/30/2013 3:24 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
+ if (size > ((phys_addr_t)~0)) + size = ((phys_addr_t)~0); + + /* arm_add_memory() already checks for the case of base + size > 4GB */ +#endif arm_add_memory(base, size); }This looks wrong for the case where 'base' is between >0 and 4GB and 'size' makes it spill over the 4GB boundary. You need to set 'size = (phys_addr_t)~0 - base' then.
Ah. I believe arm_add_memory() already has the logic to handle this case. Here, we are just trying to shrink 'size' to fit into phys_addr_t, since it is currently u64 but arm_add_memory() uses phys_addr_t for its arguments. I did not want to have this logic in two places, but I can do what you said if you like.
-- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
