Hi Jason,
Le 13/05/2013 17:19, Jason Cooper a écrit :
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:44:08AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
>> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
>> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
>> declaration for mvebu as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> Maxime,
>
> Do do want the individual submaintainers to take these? Or, send one
> branch to Arnd and Olof? I'm fine with either one as any merge
> conflicts should be trivial.
I don't have a strong opinion on this one, I guess both will be fine.
Arnd, Olof, what do you prefer?
I'll probably have to send a v2 anyway, I forgot to remove the include
of the irqchip headers.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
