On 17 April 2013 13:38, Maya Erez <merez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The sanitize support is added as a user-app ioctl call, and
> was removed from the block-device request, since its purpose is
> to be invoked not via File-System but by a user.
> This feature deletes the unmap memory region of the eMMC card,
> by writing to a specific register in the EXT_CSD.
> unmap region is the memory region that was previously deleted
> (by erase, trim or discard operation).
> In order to avoid timeout when sanitizing large-scale cards,
> the timeout for sanitize operation is 240 seconds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Maya Erez <merez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/mmc/card/queue.c | 2 +-
> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 21 ++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mmc/core.h | 2 +
> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> index e12a03c..1f043ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("mmc:block");
> #define INAND_CMD38_ARG_SECTRIM1 0x81
> #define INAND_CMD38_ARG_SECTRIM2 0x88
> #define MMC_BLK_TIMEOUT_MS (10 * 60 * 1000) /* 10 minute timeout */
> +#define MMC_SANITIZE_REQ_TIMEOUT 240000
> +#define MMC_EXTRACT_INDEX_FROM_ARG(x) ((x & 0x00FF0000) >> 16)
>
> #define mmc_req_rel_wr(req) (((req->cmd_flags & REQ_FUA) || \
> (req->cmd_flags & REQ_META)) && \
> @@ -409,6 +411,35 @@ static int ioctl_rpmb_card_status_poll(struct mmc_card *card, u32 *status,
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int ioctl_do_sanitize(struct mmc_card *card)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + if (!(mmc_can_sanitize(card) &&
> + (card->host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SANITIZE))) {
> + pr_warn("%s: %s - SANITIZE is not supported\n",
> + mmc_hostname(card->host), __func__);
> + err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: %s - SANITIZE IN PROGRESS...\n",
> + mmc_hostname(card->host), __func__);
> +
> + err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> + EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START, 1,
> + MMC_SANITIZE_REQ_TIMEOUT);
> +
> + if (err)
> + pr_err("%s: %s - EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START failed. err=%d\n",
> + mmc_hostname(card->host), __func__, err);
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: %s - SANITIZE COMPLETED\n", mmc_hostname(card->host),
> + __func__);
> +out:
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
> struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *ic_ptr)
> {
> @@ -511,6 +542,16 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
> goto cmd_rel_host;
> }
>
> + if (MMC_EXTRACT_INDEX_FROM_ARG(cmd.arg) == EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START) {
> + err = ioctl_do_sanitize(card);
> +
> + if (err)
> + pr_err("%s: ioctl_do_sanitize() failed. err = %d",
> + __func__, err);
> +
> + goto cmd_rel_host;
> + }
> +
> mmc_wait_for_req(card->host, &mrq);
>
> if (cmd.error) {
> @@ -940,10 +981,10 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_secdiscard_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq,
> {
> struct mmc_blk_data *md = mq->data;
> struct mmc_card *card = md->queue.card;
> - unsigned int from, nr, arg, trim_arg, erase_arg;
> + unsigned int from, nr, arg;
> int err = 0, type = MMC_BLK_SECDISCARD;
>
> - if (!(mmc_can_secure_erase_trim(card) || mmc_can_sanitize(card))) {
> + if (!(mmc_can_secure_erase_trim(card))) {
> err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -951,23 +992,11 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_secdiscard_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq,
> from = blk_rq_pos(req);
> nr = blk_rq_sectors(req);
>
> - /* The sanitize operation is supported at v4.5 only */
> - if (mmc_can_sanitize(card)) {
> - erase_arg = MMC_ERASE_ARG;
> - trim_arg = MMC_TRIM_ARG;
> - } else {
> - erase_arg = MMC_SECURE_ERASE_ARG;
> - trim_arg = MMC_SECURE_TRIM1_ARG;
> - }
> + if (mmc_can_trim(card) && !mmc_erase_group_aligned(card, from, nr))
> + arg = MMC_SECURE_TRIM1_ARG;
> + else
> + arg = MMC_SECURE_ERASE_ARG;
>
> - if (mmc_erase_group_aligned(card, from, nr))
> - arg = erase_arg;
> - else if (mmc_can_trim(card))
> - arg = trim_arg;
> - else {
> - err = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> - }
> retry:
> if (card->quirks & MMC_QUIRK_INAND_CMD38) {
> err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> @@ -1003,9 +1032,6 @@ retry:
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (mmc_can_sanitize(card))
> - err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> - EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START, 1, 0);
> out_retry:
> if (err && !mmc_blk_reset(md, card->host, type))
> goto retry;
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
> index 9447a0e..fa9632e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static void mmc_queue_setup_discard(struct request_queue *q,
> /* granularity must not be greater than max. discard */
> if (card->pref_erase > max_discard)
> q->limits.discard_granularity = 0;
> - if (mmc_can_secure_erase_trim(card) || mmc_can_sanitize(card))
> + if (mmc_can_secure_erase_trim(card))
> queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_SECDISCARD, q);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index 37c5dad..dea9381 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -402,6 +402,27 @@ static int mmc_wait_for_data_req_done(struct mmc_host *host,
> context_info->is_done_rcv = false;
> context_info->is_new_req = false;
> cmd = mrq->cmd;
> +
> + /*
> + * If host has timed out waiting for the sanitize
> + * to complete, card might be still in programming state
> + * so let's try to bring the card out of programming
> + * state.
> + */
> + if (cmd->sanitize_busy && cmd->error == -ETIMEDOUT) {
> + if (!mmc_interrupt_hpi(host->card)) {
> + pr_warning("%s: %s: Interrupted "
> + "sanitize\n",
> + mmc_hostname(host),
> + __func__);
> + cmd->error = 0;
> + break;
> + } else {
> + pr_err("%s: %s: Failed to interrupt "
> + "sanitize\n",
> + mmc_hostname(host), __func__);
> + }
> + }
> if (!cmd->error || !cmd->retries ||
> mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
> err = host->areq->err_check(host->card,
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/core.h b/include/linux/mmc/core.h
> index 39613b9..bd06ff5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/core.h
> @@ -96,6 +96,8 @@ struct mmc_command {
> */
>
> unsigned int cmd_timeout_ms; /* in milliseconds */
> + /* Set this flag only for blocking sanitize request */
> + bool sanitize_busy;
>
> struct mmc_data *data; /* data segment associated with cmd */
> struct mmc_request *mrq; /* associated request */
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> index e326ae2..00c10be 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> @@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ struct mmc_host {
> #define MMC_CAP2_PACKED_CMD (MMC_CAP2_PACKED_RD | \
> MMC_CAP2_PACKED_WR)
> #define MMC_CAP2_NO_PRESCAN_POWERUP (1 << 14) /* Don't power up before scan */
> +#define MMC_CAP2_SANITIZE (1 << 15) /* Support Sanitize */
Is there a specific reason to why a cap is needed? Would it be okay to
use this feature just if the card supports it?
>
> mmc_pm_flag_t pm_caps; /* supported pm features */
>
> --
> 1.7.3.3
> --
> QUALCOMM ISRAEL, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
