On 04/05/13 03:04, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
>>> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>>> index d7ad425..5928c29 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>>> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static void __cpuinit arch_timer_stop(struct clock_event_device *clk)
>>> static int __cpuinit arch_timer_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
>>> unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
>>> {
>>> - struct clock_event_device *evt = this_cpu_ptr(arch_timer_evt);
>>> + struct clock_event_device *evt = __this_cpu_ptr(arch_timer_evt);
>>>
>>> switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
>>> case CPU_STARTING:
> I'm afraid this would hide bugs if we start using the notifier for other
> purposes than exclusivity non-preemptible contexts.
>
> How about moving the this_cpu_ptr() down to the cases themselves, maybe
> with a nice comment?
Ok. v2 coming up.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
