On 03/28/13 08:22, Mark Rutland wrote: > This works on my A9x4 coretile, bringing CPUs up and down via > /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/online, so: > > Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> Thanks. I still need to resolve patch #1 though. > > Otherwise, is there any reason we couldn't now use the twd driver on a UP > system? Or would the overhead of handling frequency change make this pointless? I don't see why not but I don't have any interest in pursuing it. > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 06:17:49PM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> index 5b71469..5ad2ccf 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> @@ -1527,6 +1527,7 @@ config SMP >> depends on HAVE_SMP >> depends on MMU >> select HAVE_ARM_SCU if !ARCH_MSM_SCORPIONMP >> + select HAVE_ARM_TWD if (!ARCH_MSM_SCORPIONMP && !EXYNOS4_MCT) > Could you not depend on your "Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries" > for this? Right now the patches don't depend on the push down patch. Are you saying it would be better to depend on that patch? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
