On 03/07/13 06:00, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> +static int __init dummy_timer_register(void)
>> +{
>> + int err = register_cpu_notifier(&dummy_timer_cpu_nb);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + /* We won't get a call on the boot CPU, so register immediately */
>> + dummy_timer_setup();
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +device_initcall(dummy_timer_register);
> Are you sure that you want that to be installed unconditionally? What
> about multi-platform kernels?
>
A dummy timer is already installed unconditionally on devices with an
arm architected timer, so if this is breaking something then those
devices have been broken in the 3.9 merge window. I suppose we may need
to make the rating even lower if there is somebody using a clockevent
with a rating below 100. My grep of the tree shows 125 as the lowest,
but perhaps we want to set the rating to 1 to be safe?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
