On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:38:42AM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > On Tuesday 05 June 2012 09:46 PM, David Collins wrote: > >In the long term, this problem should go away of its own accord. However, > >in the short term, many systems are converting over to using device tree. > > Therefore, we are left with a situation currently where some regulator > >consumer drivers are being probed via device tree and some are being > >probed via board file devices within a single platform. > > Is this a situation you are facing in your mainline kernel or internal > trees? What you explain would need you to work with hybrid board files > with some devices created through device tree and some others statically > from the board file in the kernel, and that approach was already shot > down as unacceptable. As I understand, this is something being done on our internal kernel. I don't think this really applies to the mainline kernel, since none of these transitionary drivers are going into the upstream kernel without being made to work with device tree. Thanks, David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
