On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 11:13:34AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > I agree with you as well, it is frustrating. Could we agree, that once > this patch is in, we freeze the core until the start of the next > cycle. We use the remainder of this cycle for porting platforms to the > generic clock framework. Or merge the platforms then do framework changes incrementally, updating the platforms as we go (which is the normal pattern for maintaining a framework...). I see we've already got SPEAr merged.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
