On Tue, March 20, 2012 10:45 pm, Turquette, Mike wrote: > IIRC, that discussion was with respect to the .parent member of struct > clk. It was decided that having .parent = NULL does not imply that a > clock is a root clock, but instead we rely on the CLK_IS_ROOT flag. I > can't think of any other instance where a NULL clk when returned from > a registration function would be useful. I wasn't referring to a discussion with regards to this patch series. I'm referring to what I believe was a discussion with Russell King on whether a NULL from clk_get() should be considered a clock and whether it should be usable as a "clock" with the clock APIs. That's the reason clk_get() returns -ENOENT instead of NULL. -Saravana -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
