Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: Move init fields from clk to clk_hw

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Sascha

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:

> [ C99 structure initializer elided ]
> 
> This will make a 4000 line file out of a 500 line file. Now when for
> some reason struct clk_divider changes we end with big patches. If the
> clk core gets a new fancy CLK_ flag which we want to have then again
> we end up with big patches. Then there's also the possibility that
> someone finds out that .lock and .hw.flags are common to all dividers
> and comes up with a #define DEFINE_CLK_DIVIDER again to share common
> fields.

At least we can understand easily what is being changed.  Readability, 
particularly by others not familiar with the clock data, is more important 
to me.

So like Saravana, I too prefer C99 structure initializers.  At least there 
should be a choice.

Quick quiz: in this line below:

imx_clk_divider("foo_clk", "bar_clk", CCM_BASE + 0x20, 0x5, 0x3);

which field is the bitfield shift and which is the bitfield width? :-)


- Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux