Hello Sascha On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote: > [ C99 structure initializer elided ] > > This will make a 4000 line file out of a 500 line file. Now when for > some reason struct clk_divider changes we end with big patches. If the > clk core gets a new fancy CLK_ flag which we want to have then again > we end up with big patches. Then there's also the possibility that > someone finds out that .lock and .hw.flags are common to all dividers > and comes up with a #define DEFINE_CLK_DIVIDER again to share common > fields. At least we can understand easily what is being changed. Readability, particularly by others not familiar with the clock data, is more important to me. So like Saravana, I too prefer C99 structure initializers. At least there should be a choice. Quick quiz: in this line below: imx_clk_divider("foo_clk", "bar_clk", CCM_BASE + 0x20, 0x5, 0x3); which field is the bitfield shift and which is the bitfield width? :-) - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html