On Wed, Mar 09 2011, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 02/24/2011 10:44 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> These are a few updates to SCM. The first two patches fix some >> bad code generation. The next patch saves a couple instructions >> on the slow path and the final patch determines the cacheline >> size dynamically instead of statically. >> >> Stephen Boyd (4): >> msm: scm: Mark inline asm as volatile >> msm: scm: Fix improper register assignment >> msm: scm: Check for interruption immediately >> msm: scm: Get cacheline size from CTR > > Can we queue up patches 1 to 3 from this series for the next window? It > looks like everyone is ok with them. I'll respin the fourth patch once I > figure out where to go with it. Seems reasonable to me. I'll break the first three out and include them into msm-next. Stephen Boyd (3): msm: scm: Mark inline asm as volatile msm: scm: Fix improper register assignment msm: scm: Check for interruption immediately arch/arm/mach-msm/scm.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) I have pulled these changes into my MSM tree, which can be found at git://codeaurora.org/quic/kernel/davidb/linux-msm.git in the for-next branch This patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree (usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.) The path will hopefully also be merged in Linus' tree for the next -rc kernel release. Thanks, David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
