Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update MSM maintainers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > There's nothing really to figure out. I don't feel like you and David
> > can do the job alone. My intentions are just to make sure that you don't
> > mess with my targets, and that you do the right thing by the community.
> > 
> > Daniel
> 
> I'd like to address the points you mention.  I disagree with your
> personal feelings about David's suitability for the task.  David has
> been involved with Linux MSM development for it's entire history.

So he's great developer.

> responsibility.  I agree that this is a somewhat new role for him, but
> maintainers have to start somewhere.  From what I've seen so far, David
> is showing the proper maturity and judgement expected from a
> maintainer.  As an example, I would point to David's handling of
> Arnd's

So you agree dwalker has more experience as maintainer, and cite an
example where dbrown handled things ok.

But you know this patch was great counterexample. Trying to remove
someone from mainainers without asking them first is very very
impolite...
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux