Re: [PATCH 2/4] msm: iommu: Rework clock logic and add IOMMU bus clock control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/24/2011 11:29 PM, Trilok Soni wrote:
Hi Steve,

Hello

@@ -130,117 +131,134 @@ static int msm_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  {
  	struct resource *r, *r2;
  	struct clk *iommu_clk;
+	struct clk *iommu_pclk;
  	struct msm_iommu_drvdata *drvdata;
  	struct msm_iommu_dev *iommu_dev = pdev->dev.platform_data;
const please.


I am not clear on what you mean. Please be more specific here.

+	iommu_pclk = clk_get(NULL, "smmu_pclk");
+	if (IS_ERR(iommu_pclk)) {
+		ret = -ENODEV;
+		goto fail;
+	}
I am not a big fan of this when you have the "device" around. You should just do

iommu_pclk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);

...error logic...

iommu_clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "iommu_clk");

...error logic...


The pclk is a "special" bus clock and does not have a specific device instance associated with it, so passing a device would not be appropriate in this case. I pass the device for other clocks that are indeed associated with devices, but this is not one of them. I suppose we could create 11 or 12 aliases for the pclk and associate it with all the IOMMU devices, but I would prefer to avoid doing that as I believe the current approach is cleaner.

-			ret = -EBUSY;
-			goto fail;
-		}
+	len = r->end - r->start + 1;

resource_size please.


Ok


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux