On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 16:17 -0800, David Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22 2011, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 12:47 -0800, Dima Zavin wrote: > > > >> What is the problem leaving it under arch/arm/mach-msm? > > > > Because it's a driver. > > There are a lot of other drivers currently under various arch > subsystems. I'm not sure if a driver that is specific to only one arch > has a strong reason to be elsewhere in the kernel. If there was a > possibility of there being other devices that used SSBI, it might make > sense to put it elsewhere. But, as far as I know, this device is only > found on MSM chips. There are lots of arch specific drivers under drivers/ . In fact I'm sure there are more arch specific drivers under drivers/ than anyplace else. That's how we organize things in Linux. > It seems kind of unusual to create an entirely new directory under > drivers to hold what will only ever be a single driver. Then put it under another directory. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
