On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:25 -0800, David Brown wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/include/mach/cpu.h >> b/arch/arm/mach-msm/include/mach/cpu.h >> index e1ba9db..a9481b0 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/include/mach/cpu.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/include/mach/cpu.h >> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ >> #define cpu_is_msm7x30() 0 >> #define cpu_is_qsd8x50() 0 >> #define cpu_is_msm8x60() 0 >> +#define cpu_is_msm8960() 0 > > The naming is just perverted even more here.. What do you want me to call it? #define cpu_is_97d0c886-3768-4998-8925-16f36209d0d1() It's the name of the chip. We've already been through this. The names are unfortunate, but it is what the devices are called. At some point, I may change the msm8x60 to something more specific, such as msm8260, or msm8660, one of the devices that it represents. But this isn't correct, either. There really isn't a good answer. David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
