On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 05:46:34AM -0800, merez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:58AM, Greg KH wrote: > > Ok, but please note the word of "proprietary" usually means something > else when talking about kernel code (i.e. licensing issues.) > > > > I'll be glad to take this type of patch when you also provide a patch > that uses the callback, but not before then. > > What I meant by "proprietary" is not proprietary in the terms of kernel > world. I meant a unique algorithm, different from the default. Sorry for > the misunderstanding. > Currently we don't have a unique algorithm. When implementing this change > we thought it may be useful for other controllers but for us the default > implementation was good enough. First rule of kernel development, "don't add infrastructure that you do not need today." thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
