On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 14:23 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Dec 11, 2010 7:45 AM, "Daniel Walker" <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > How do people feel about Change-Id's at the end of commit messages? > > In general, I think the rule should be that tags are ok as long as > they are useful for EVERYBODY. if it's some internal company tag, > expect people to complain. If it doesn't have meaning to others, why > should it be in the public tree? Ok .. I couldn't agree with you more. > If you have some internal tracking thing, just associate the commit > ids (or " patch ids") with your internal tracker - don't make anybody > else have to look at crud that gas no meaning to them. > > (Sent from my phone so this probably has HTML crud and gets bounced > from the mailing lists) Hopefully my reply doesn't get bounced .. Daniel -- Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
