Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] msm: add SMP support for msm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:28:21PM -0800, Jeff Ohlstein wrote:
+int get_core_count(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_NR_CPUS
+	return CONFIG_NR_CPUS;
+#else
+	return 1;
+#endif

When would CONFIG_NR_CPUS not be set when SMP is available?

Note that linux/threads.h defines this to 1 if it's not already defined
anyway.  Does this really need to be a separate function?

Removed.
+int boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
+{
+	static int cold_boot_done;
+	int cnt = 0;
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "Starting secondary CPU %d\n", cpu);
+
+	if (cold_boot_done == false) {
+		prepare_cold_cpu(cpu);
+		cold_boot_done = true;
+	}
+
+	pen_release = cpu;
+	dmac_flush_range((void *)&pen_release,
+			 (void *)(&pen_release + sizeof(pen_release)));

Abuse of the DMA API.  See how other platforms deal with this.

Fixed to use __cpuc_flush_dcache_area and outer_clean_range.
+	__asm__("sev");
+	dsb();
+
+	/* Use smp_cross_call() to send a soft interrupt to wake up
+	 * the other core.
+	 */
+	smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(cpu));
+
+	while (pen_release != 0xFFFFFFFF) {

Why 0xFFFFFFFF rather than -1 like everyone else does?

Removed due to below.
+		smp_rmb();
+		msleep_interruptible(1);
+		if (cnt++ >= SECONDARY_CPU_WAIT_MS)
+			break;
+	}

And why not use the same loop as everyone else does?

        timeout = jiffies + (1 * HZ);
        while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
                smp_rmb();
                if (pen_release == -1)
                        break;

                udelay(10);
        }

IOW, what's the point of being different when you're trying to do the
same task?

Done.
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* Mask for edge trigger PPIs except AVS_SVICINT and AVS_SVICINTSWDONE */
+#define GIC_PPI_EDGE_MASK 0xFFFFD7FF
+
+/* Initialization routine for secondary CPUs after they are brought out of
+ * reset.
+*/
+void platform_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: cpu:%d\n", __func__, cpu);
+
+	trace_hardirqs_off();

This has been moved into the generic SMP code.

I've rebased onto your gic patches and your smp series, and removed this.
+	if (!machine_is_msm8x60_sim())
+		writel(0x0000FFFF, MSM_QGIC_DIST_BASE + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET);

The gic secondary CPU initialization now takes care of this in my tree.

Removed.
+
+	/*
+	 * setup GIC (GIC number NOT CPU number and the base address of the
+	 * GIC CPU interface
+	 */
+	gic_cpu_init(0, MSM_QGIC_CPU_BASE);

This has been renamed to gic_secondary_init() for 2.6.38.

Done.

--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux