On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 11:30 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Is there some way to force GCC to do what I want (interleave the > functions)? It seems happy to inline them and then optimize the > register > usage and instruction ordering. Perhaps that is OK though and we're > wasting our time trying to be conservative in code size. Is it possible to do all this in assembly ? Can't you have the default implementation using this assembly with different function names, then just set the assembly function names in C code someplace? Daniel -- Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
