On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 21:36 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 12:58:06PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > From: Steve Muckle <smuckle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > ScorpionMP is a configuration of Scorpion processors. It supports local > > timers. > > Beware - things have changed around here - relevant hunks from my > devel branch: Yeah, that's why I wanted to send out these patches.. I saw an earlier email that suggested you changed this area. I didn't want to base my tree off your devel branch tho. > @@ -1142,13 +1145,13 @@ source "kernel/time/Kconfig" > > config SMP > bool "Symmetric Multi-Processing (EXPERIMENTAL)" > - depends on EXPERIMENTAL && (REALVIEW_EB_ARM11MP || REALVIEW_EB_A9MP ||\ > - MACH_REALVIEW_PB11MP || MACH_REALVIEW_PBX || ARCH_OMAP4 ||\ > - ARCH_S5PV310 || ARCH_TEGRA || ARCH_U8500 || ARCH_VEXPRESS_CA9X4) > + depends on EXPERIMENTAL > depends on GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS > + depends on REALVIEW_EB_ARM11MP || REALVIEW_EB_A9MP || \ > + MACH_REALVIEW_PB11MP || MACH_REALVIEW_PBX || ARCH_OMAP4 ||\ > + ARCH_S5PV310 || ARCH_TEGRA || ARCH_U8500 || ARCH_VEXPRESS_CA9X4 select USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS > - select HAVE_ARM_SCU if ARCH_REALVIEW || ARCH_OMAP4 || ARCH_S5PV310 ||\ > - ARCH_TEGRA || ARCH_U8500 || ARCH_VEXPRESS_CA9X4 > + select HAVE_ARM_SCU > help > This enables support for systems with more than one CPU. If you have > a system with only one CPU, like most personal computers, say N. If > @@ -1216,12 +1232,9 @@ config HOTPLUG_CPU > > config LOCAL_TIMERS > bool "Use local timer interrupts" > - depends on SMP && (REALVIEW_EB_ARM11MP || MACH_REALVIEW_PB11MP || \ > - REALVIEW_EB_A9MP || MACH_REALVIEW_PBX || ARCH_OMAP4 || \ > - ARCH_S5PV310 || ARCH_TEGRA || ARCH_U8500 || ARCH_VEXPRESS_CA9X4)+ depends on SMP > default y > - select HAVE_ARM_TWD if ARCH_REALVIEW || ARCH_OMAP4 || ARCH_S5PV310 || \ > - ARCH_TEGRA || ARCH_U8500 || ARCH_VEXPRESS > + select HAVE_ARM_TWD > help > Enable support for local timers on SMP platforms, rather then the > legacy IPI broadcast method. Local timers allows the system > > Basically, everyone who was supporting SMP also supported local timers, > TWD and SCU, so having the big long lists of dependencies was becoming > silly. > > If anyone (ever) creates a SMP implementation not using ARMs TWD/GIC/SCU, > then we can see about changing the way we handle the support for these. We actually don't have SCU or TWD. So I suppose we can just have "if !ARCH_MSM" for SCU/TWD , if that's reasonable. How do you want to me to make changes to this area tho? Daniel -- Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
