On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 14:54 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 05:57 +0100, Jeff Ohlstein wrote:
> > From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ScorpionMP does not have the SMP/nAMP and TLB ops broadcasting bits in
> > ACTLR.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
> > index 7aaf88a..98fd7e5 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
> > @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ __v7_setup:
> > orreq r0, r0, #(1 << 6) | (1 << 0) @ Enable SMP/nAMP mode and
> > mcreq p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 1 @ TLB ops broadcasting
> > #endif
> > +__v7_msm_setup:
> > adr r12, __v7_setup_stack @ the local stack
> > stmia r12, {r0-r5, r7, r9, r11, lr}
> > bl v7_flush_dcache_all
>
> It may be better to move the generic __v7_setup here and have a specific
> entry for ARM Ltd cores (mask 0xff0f0000 and value 0x410f0000).
I'm not sure I follow you.. Are you saying there are other cpu's that
don't need the SMP stuff at the top of __v7_setup ?
> In general, I would have liked a different way (still ID-based) of
> handling such issues without duplicating the whole structure. But I see
> this becoming the standard as proc-v6.S follows it as well.
This whole thing was something Russell specifically asked for (and
practically wrote for me).
Daniel
--
Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
