On Tue 2010-05-25 00:51:15, David Brown wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:55:40AM -0700, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without > > > + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are > > > + * met: > > > > Is this even GPL compatible? > > Um, this is a standard 3-clause BSD license. There are nearly > 900 existing files in the kernel that have this license on them. Are you sure? I believe that Dual GPL/BSD is ok, just BSD is not. pavel@amd:/data/l/linux-good$ less ./include/linux/license.h #ifndef __LICENSE_H #define __LICENSE_H static inline int license_is_gpl_compatible(const char *license) { return (strcmp(license, "GPL") == 0 || strcmp(license, "GPL v2") == 0 || strcmp(license, "GPL and additional rights") == 0 || strcmp(license, "Dual BSD/GPL") == 0 || strcmp(license, "Dual MIT/GPL") == 0 || strcmp(license, "Dual MPL/GPL") == 0); } Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html