Daniel Walker wrote: > > I'm ok with doing renames once all the code is merged .. That's always > been one of the options with the Google code. > No. Please, no. The ideal outcome is that the kernel.org code becomes the canonical source code for the platform, i.e. the difference between kernel.org and Google/Qualcomm-internal code is nil. You might not ever get there, but you pretty much close off that opportunity entirely when you start renaming stuff. > However, we need some future direction .. If we do a rename later on > with the older code, then we ideally want new code to be submitted with > appropriate names.. > ... which requires work from all interested parties: Qualcomm, Google, and the community. Far less likely to happen than, say, we all learn that "mahimahi == Nexus One" because we read it in a comment somewhere. b.g. -- Bill Gatliff Embedded systems training and consulting http://billgatliff.com bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
