Re: [PATCH v1] asm-generic: introduce be56 unaligned accessors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 7, 2024, at 14:40, Marius.Cristea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-09-29 at 21:16 +0000, David Laight wrote:
>> [You don't often get email from david.laight@xxxxxxxxxx. Learn why
>> this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ;]
>> 
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
>> know the content is safe
>> 
>> From: marius.cristea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Sent: 27 September 2024 09:36
>> > 
>> > The PAC194X, IIO driver, is using some unaligned 56 bit registers.
>> > Provide some helper accessors in preparation for the new driver.
>> 
>> Someone please shoot the hardware engineer ;-)
>> 
>> Do separate unaligned access of the first 4 bytes and last four
>> bytes.
>> It can't matter if the middle byte is accessed twice.
>> 
>> Or, for reads read 8 bytes from 'p & ~1ul' and then fixup
>> the value.
>> 
>
> Do you recommend me to drop this patch?
>
> I know that there are some "workarounds", but those didn't "looks"
> nice. I was using that function locally and I got a suggestion from the
> IIO subsystem maintainer to move it into the kernel in order for others
> to used it.

My feeling is that this is too specific to one driver, I don't
expect it to be shared much. I also suspect that most 56-bit
integers in data structures are actually always part of a naturally
aligned 64-bit word. If that is the case here, the driver can
probably better access it as a normal 64-bit number and mask
out the upper 56 bits using the include/linux/bitfield.h helpers.

        Arnd





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux