On 07/10/2024 12:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2024, at 11:01, Vincenzo Frascino wrote: >> On 04/10/2024 14:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> >> It seemed harmless from the tests I did. But adding an '&& >> defined(CONFIG_32BIT)' makes it logically correct. I will add a comment as well >> in the next version. > > To clarify: this has to be "!defined(CONFIG_64BIT)", as most > 32-bit architectures don't define the CONFIG_32BIT symbol > (but all 64-bit ones define CONFIG_64BIT). > You are right, it seemed that every 32-bit architectures with a 64-bit phys_addr_t had CONFIG_32BIT but this is not the case. > Arnd -- Regards, Vincenzo
