On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 1:37 AM H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 10/5/24 01:31, Uros Bizjak wrote: > >> > >> movq $sym to leaq sym(%rip) which you said ought to be smaller (and in > >> reality appears to be the same size, 7 bytes) seems like a no-brainer > >> and can be treated as a code quality issue -- in other words, file bug > >> reports against gcc and clang. > > > > It is the kernel assembly source that should be converted to > > rip-relative form, gcc (and probably clang) have nothing with it. > > > > Sadly, that is not correct; neither gcc nor clang uses lea: > > -hpa > > > gcc version 14.2.1 20240912 (Red Hat 14.2.1-3) (GCC) > > hpa@tazenda:/tmp$ cat foo.c > int foobar; > > int *where_is_foobar(void) > { > return &foobar; > } > > hpa@tazenda:/tmp$ gcc -mcmodel=kernel -O2 -c -o foo.o foo.c Indeed, but my reply was in the context of -fpie, which guarantees RIP relative access. IOW, the compiler will always generate sym(%rip) with -fpie, but (obviously) can't change assembly code in the kernel when the PIE is requested. Otherwise, MOV $immediate, %reg is faster when PIE is not required, which is the case with -mcmodel=kernel. IIRC, LEA with %rip had some performance issues, which may not be the case anymore with newer processors. Due to the non-negligible impact of PIE, perhaps some kind of CONFIG_PIE config definition should be introduced, so the assembly code would be able to choose optimal asm sequence when PIE and non-PIE is requested? Uros.