Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm: madvise: implement lightweight guard page mechanism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Lorenzo,

Please add me to this series, I 'm interested in everything related to
mseal :-), thanks.

I also added Kees into the cc, since mseal is a security feature.


On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 5:52 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Implement a new lightweight guard page feature, that is regions of userland
> virtual memory that, when accessed, cause a fatal signal to arise.
>
> Currently users must establish PROT_NONE ranges to achieve this.
>
> However this is very costly memory-wise - we need a VMA for each and every
> one of these regions AND they become unmergeable with surrounding VMAs.
>
> In addition repeated mmap() calls require repeated kernel context switches
> and contention of the mmap lock to install these ranges, potentially also
> having to unmap memory if installed over existing ranges.
>
> The lightweight guard approach eliminates the VMA cost altogether - rather
> than establishing a PROT_NONE VMA, it operates at the level of page table
> entries - poisoning PTEs such that accesses to them cause a fault followed
> by a SIGSGEV signal being raised.
>
> This is achieved through the PTE marker mechanism, which a previous commit
> in this series extended to permit this to be done, installed via the
> generic page walking logic, also extended by a prior commit for this
> purpose.
>
> These poison ranges are established with MADV_GUARD_POISON, and if the
> range in which they are installed contain any existing mappings, they will
> be zapped, i.e. free the range and unmap memory (thus mimicking the
> behaviour of MADV_DONTNEED in this respect).
>
> Any existing poison entries will be left untouched. There is no nesting of
> poisoned pages.
>
> Poisoned ranges are NOT cleared by MADV_DONTNEED, as this would be rather
> unexpected behaviour, but are cleared on process teardown or unmapping of
> memory ranges.
>
> Ranges can have the poison property removed by MADV_GUARD_UNPOISON -
> 'remedying' the poisoning. The ranges over which this is applied, should
> they contain non-poison entries, will be untouched, only poison entries
> will be cleared.
>
> We permit this operation on anonymous memory only, and only VMAs which are
> non-special, non-huge and not mlock()'d (if we permitted this we'd have to
> drop locked pages which would be rather counterintuitive).
>
> The poisoning of the range must be performed under mmap write lock as we
> have to install an anon_vma to ensure correct behaviour on fork.
>
> Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/mman.h     |   3 +
>  arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/mman.h      |   3 +
>  arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/mman.h    |   3 +
>  arch/xtensa/include/uapi/asm/mman.h    |   3 +
>  include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h |   3 +
>  mm/madvise.c                           | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/mprotect.c                          |   3 +-
>  mm/mseal.c                             |   1 +
>  8 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/mman.h b/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> index 763929e814e9..71e13f27742d 100644
> --- a/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> +++ b/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,9 @@
>
>  #define MADV_COLLAPSE  25              /* Synchronous hugepage collapse */
>
> +#define MADV_GUARD_POISON 102          /* fatal signal on access to range */
> +#define MADV_GUARD_UNPOISON 103                /* revoke guard poisoning */
> +
>  /* compatibility flags */
>  #define MAP_FILE       0
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/mman.h b/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> index 9c48d9a21aa0..1a2222322f77 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> @@ -105,6 +105,9 @@
>
>  #define MADV_COLLAPSE  25              /* Synchronous hugepage collapse */
>
> +#define MADV_GUARD_POISON 102          /* fatal signal on access to range */
> +#define MADV_GUARD_UNPOISON 103                /* revoke guard poisoning */
> +
>  /* compatibility flags */
>  #define MAP_FILE       0
>
> diff --git a/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/mman.h b/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> index 68c44f99bc93..380905522397 100644
> --- a/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> +++ b/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,9 @@
>  #define MADV_HWPOISON     100          /* poison a page for testing */
>  #define MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE 101          /* soft offline page for testing */
>
> +#define MADV_GUARD_POISON 102          /* fatal signal on access to range */
> +#define MADV_GUARD_UNPOISON 103                /* revoke guard poisoning */
> +
>  /* compatibility flags */
>  #define MAP_FILE       0
>
> diff --git a/arch/xtensa/include/uapi/asm/mman.h b/arch/xtensa/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> index 1ff0c858544f..e8d5affceb28 100644
> --- a/arch/xtensa/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> +++ b/arch/xtensa/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> @@ -113,6 +113,9 @@
>
>  #define MADV_COLLAPSE  25              /* Synchronous hugepage collapse */
>
> +#define MADV_GUARD_POISON 102          /* fatal signal on access to range */
> +#define MADV_GUARD_UNPOISON 103                /* revoke guard poisoning */
> +
>  /* compatibility flags */
>  #define MAP_FILE       0
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> index 6ce1f1ceb432..5dfd3d442de4 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,9 @@
>
>  #define MADV_COLLAPSE  25              /* Synchronous hugepage collapse */
>
> +#define MADV_GUARD_POISON 102          /* fatal signal on access to range */
> +#define MADV_GUARD_UNPOISON 103                /* revoke guard poisoning */
> +
>  /* compatibility flags */
>  #define MAP_FILE       0
>
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index e871a72a6c32..7216e10723ae 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static int madvise_need_mmap_write(int behavior)
>         case MADV_POPULATE_READ:
>         case MADV_POPULATE_WRITE:
>         case MADV_COLLAPSE:
> +       case MADV_GUARD_UNPOISON: /* Only poisoning needs a write lock. */
>                 return 0;
>         default:
>                 /* be safe, default to 1. list exceptions explicitly */
> @@ -1017,6 +1018,157 @@ static long madvise_remove(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>         return error;
>  }
>
> +static bool is_valid_guard_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma, bool allow_locked)
> +{
> +       vm_flags_t disallowed = VM_SPECIAL | VM_HUGETLB;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * A user could lock after poisoning but that's fine, as they'd not be
> +        * able to fault in. The issue arises when we try to zap existing locked
> +        * VMAs. We don't want to do that.
> +        */
> +       if (!allow_locked)
> +               disallowed |= VM_LOCKED;
> +
> +       if (!vma_is_anonymous(vma))
> +               return false;
> +
> +       if ((vma->vm_flags & (VM_MAYWRITE | disallowed)) != VM_MAYWRITE)
> +               return false;
> +
> +       return true;
> +}
> +
> +static int guard_poison_install_pte(unsigned long addr, unsigned long next,
> +                                   pte_t *ptep, struct mm_walk *walk)
> +{
> +       unsigned long *num_installed = (unsigned long *)walk->private;
> +
> +       (*num_installed)++;
> +       /* Simply install a PTE marker, this causes segfault on access. */
> +       *ptep = make_pte_marker(PTE_MARKER_GUARD);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static bool is_guard_pte_marker(pte_t ptent)
> +{
> +       return is_pte_marker(ptent) &&
> +               is_guard_swp_entry(pte_to_swp_entry(ptent));
> +}
> +
> +static int guard_poison_pte_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
> +                                 unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
> +{
> +       pte_t ptent = ptep_get(pte);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * If not a guard marker, simply abort the operation. We return a value
> +        * > 0 indicating a non-error abort.
> +        */
> +       return !is_guard_pte_marker(ptent);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mm_walk_ops guard_poison_walk_ops = {
> +       .install_pte            = guard_poison_install_pte,
> +       .pte_entry              = guard_poison_pte_entry,
> +       /* We might need to install an anon_vma. */
> +       .walk_lock              = PGWALK_WRLOCK,
> +};
> +
> +static long madvise_guard_poison(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +                                struct vm_area_struct **prev,
> +                                unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> +{
> +       long err;
> +       bool retried = false;
> +
> +       *prev = vma;
> +       if (!is_valid_guard_vma(vma, /* allow_locked = */false))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Optimistically try to install the guard poison pages first. If any
> +        * non-guard pages are encountered, give up and zap the range before
> +        * trying again.
> +        */
> +       while (true) {
> +               unsigned long num_installed = 0;
> +
> +               /* Returns < 0 on error, == 0 if success, > 0 if zap needed. */
> +               err = walk_page_range_mm(vma->vm_mm, start, end,
> +                                        &guard_poison_walk_ops,
> +                                        &num_installed);
> +               /*
> +                * If we install poison markers, then the range is no longer
> +                * empty from a page table perspective and therefore it's
> +                * appropriate to have an anon_vma.
> +                *
> +                * This ensures that on fork, we copy page tables correctly.
> +                */
> +               if (err >= 0 && num_installed > 0) {
> +                       int err_anon = anon_vma_prepare(vma);
> +
> +                       if (err_anon)
> +                               err = err_anon;
> +               }
> +
> +               if (err <= 0)
> +                       return err;
> +
> +               if (!retried)
> +                       /*
> +                        * OK some of the range have non-guard pages mapped, zap
> +                        * them. This leaves existing guard pages in place.
> +                        */
> +                       zap_page_range_single(vma, start, end - start, NULL);
> +               else
> +                       /*
> +                        * If we reach here, then there is a racing fault that
> +                        * has populated the PTE after we zapped. Give up and
> +                        * let the user know to try again.
> +                        */
> +                       return -EAGAIN;
> +
> +               retried = true;
> +       }
> +}
> +
> +static int guard_unpoison_pte_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
> +                                   unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
> +{
> +       pte_t ptent = ptep_get(pte);
> +
> +       if (is_guard_pte_marker(ptent)) {
> +               /* Simply clear the PTE marker. */
> +               pte_clear_not_present_full(walk->mm, addr, pte, true);
> +               update_mmu_cache(walk->vma, addr, pte);
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mm_walk_ops guard_unpoison_walk_ops = {
> +       .pte_entry              = guard_unpoison_pte_entry,
> +       .walk_lock              = PGWALK_RDLOCK,
> +};
> +
> +static long madvise_guard_unpoison(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +                                  struct vm_area_struct **prev,
> +                                  unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> +{
> +       *prev = vma;
> +       /*
> +        * We're ok with unpoisoning mlock()'d ranges, as this is a
> +        * non-destructive action.
> +        */
> +       if (!is_valid_guard_vma(vma, /* allow_locked = */true))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       return walk_page_range(vma->vm_mm, start, end,
> +                              &guard_unpoison_walk_ops, NULL);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Apply an madvise behavior to a region of a vma.  madvise_update_vma
>   * will handle splitting a vm area into separate areas, each area with its own
> @@ -1098,6 +1250,10 @@ static int madvise_vma_behavior(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>                 break;
>         case MADV_COLLAPSE:
>                 return madvise_collapse(vma, prev, start, end);
> +       case MADV_GUARD_POISON:
> +               return madvise_guard_poison(vma, prev, start, end);
> +       case MADV_GUARD_UNPOISON:
> +               return madvise_guard_unpoison(vma, prev, start, end);
>         }
>
>         anon_name = anon_vma_name(vma);
> @@ -1197,6 +1353,8 @@ madvise_behavior_valid(int behavior)
>         case MADV_DODUMP:
>         case MADV_WIPEONFORK:
>         case MADV_KEEPONFORK:
> +       case MADV_GUARD_POISON:
> +       case MADV_GUARD_UNPOISON:
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
>         case MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE:
>         case MADV_HWPOISON:
> diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
> index 0c5d6d06107d..d0e3ebfadef8 100644
> --- a/mm/mprotect.c
> +++ b/mm/mprotect.c
> @@ -236,7 +236,8 @@ static long change_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>                         } else if (is_pte_marker_entry(entry)) {
>                                 /*
>                                  * Ignore error swap entries unconditionally,
> -                                * because any access should sigbus anyway.
> +                                * because any access should sigbus/sigsegv
> +                                * anyway.
>                                  */
>                                 if (is_poisoned_swp_entry(entry))
>                                         continue;
> diff --git a/mm/mseal.c b/mm/mseal.c
> index ece977bd21e1..21bf5534bcf5 100644
> --- a/mm/mseal.c
> +++ b/mm/mseal.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ static bool is_madv_discard(int behavior)
>         case MADV_REMOVE:
>         case MADV_DONTFORK:
>         case MADV_WIPEONFORK:
> +       case MADV_GUARD_POISON:

Can you please describe the rationale to add this to the existing
mseal's semantic ?

I didn't not find any description from the cover letter or this
patch's description, hence asking.

Thanks
-Jeff

>                 return true;
>         }
>
> --
> 2.46.2
>
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux