On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 11:33:23AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 at 12:51, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Please, review. I don't really care which tree(s) does that stuff
> > go through; I can put the first two in my #for-next, as long as nobody
> > has objections to the patches themselves.
>
> Please just add the whole series to your tree. I see you already got
> the ack for the parisc side, the arc side looks fine too.
Both parisc and arc are already in my tree; do you really want the
autogenerated patch to be there as well? Would be a recurring headache
through the cycle - anyone adding an include of that sucker in their
branch would have to do an explicit merge from that branch first, or
deal with the silent conflicts on merge to -next (well, silent as in
"git doesn't warn you"; build breakage will be there).
I suppose I could do that autogenerated commit + replacement of
asm-generic/unaligned.h with #include <linux/unaligned.h>,
then take the newly added includes of <asm{,-generic}/unaligned.h> after -rc1,
with asm-generic/unaligned.h taken out once all strays are gone, but that
feels too convoluted...
Or am I misparsing you?
> And even if there is some further fixup required, I'd rather just have
> this done and do any possible fixups later than have some kind of
> "wait for everybody to ack it".
