Hi Christophe, On 27/08/2024 18:14, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 27/08/2024 à 18:05, Vincenzo Frascino a écrit : >> Hi Christophe, >> >> On 27/08/2024 11:49, Christophe Leroy wrote: >> >> ... ... >> >> Could you please clarify where minmax is needed? I tried to build Jason's master >> tree for x86, commenting the header and it seems building fine. I might be >> missing something. > > Without it: > > VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-32.o > In file included from /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/lib/vdso/getrandom.c:11, > from <command-line>: ... > > >> >>> Same for ARRAY_SIZE(->reserved) by the way, easy to do opencode, we also have it >>> only once >>> >> >> I have a similar issue to figure out why linux/array_size.h and >> uapi/linux/random.h are needed. It seems that I can build the object without >> them. Could you please explain? > > Without linux/array_size.h: > > VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-32.o > In file included from <command-line>: > /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/lib/vdso/getrandom.c: In function > '__cvdso_getrandom_data': > /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/lib/vdso/getrandom.c:89:40: error: implicit If this is the case, those headers should be defined for the powerpc implementation only. The generic implementation should be interpreted as the minimum common denominator in between all the architectures for what concerns the headers. -- Regards, Vincenzo
