[PATCH v4 22/26] mm: numa_memblks: use memblock_{start,end}_of_DRAM() when sanitizing meminfo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>

numa_cleanup_meminfo() moves blocks outside system RAM to
numa_reserved_meminfo and it uses 0 and PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) to determine
the memory boundaries.

Replace the memory range boundaries with more portable
memblock_start_of_DRAM() and memblock_end_of_DRAM().

Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx> # for x86_64 and arm64
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> [arm64 + CXL via QEMU]
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/numa_memblks.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/numa_memblks.c b/mm/numa_memblks.c
index e97665a5e8ce..e4358ad92233 100644
--- a/mm/numa_memblks.c
+++ b/mm/numa_memblks.c
@@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
  */
 int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 {
-	const u64 low = 0;
-	const u64 high = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn);
+	const u64 low = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
+	const u64 high = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
 	int i, j, k;
 
 	/* first, trim all entries */
-- 
2.43.0





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux