On Tue, Jul 30, 2024, at 06:29, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 7/25/24 11:18, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> >> - Wrapped genmask_u128_test() with CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 >> - Defined __BITS_PER_U128 unconditionally as 128 >> - Defined __GENMASK_U128() via new _BIT128() >> - Dropped _U128() and _AC128() > > Does the changed series look good ? Please do let me know if something > further needs to be changed. Thank you. Yes, these look fine to me, please add Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> One detail: You are not actually using __BITS_PER_U128 at all now, so I think it would be better to not add it at all.
