On 7/26/24 02:35, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 11:18:06 +0530 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> This adds support for GENMASK_U128() and some corresponding tests as well. >> GENMASK_U128() generated 128 bit masks will be required later on the arm64 >> platform for enabling FEAT_SYSREG128 and FEAT_D128 features. > > If this will be required for ongoing ARM development prior to the 6.11 > release then it would make sense for these changes to be carried in the > relevant ARM tree. Hello Andrew, These changes are not required prior to 6.11, hence being taken via the mm tree is fine. - Anshuman
