Re: [PATCH 10/17] arm64: generate 64-bit syscall.tbl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 10:57:25AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> Thanks for the report! I just panicked a bit and thought I had
> done something entirely wrong here, but after having a closer
> look it turned out to be a silly typo:

> -#include <unistd_64.h>
> +#include <asm/unistd_64.h>

Doh, I should've spotted that even from the very quick look I gave it!
Thanks for the quick fix.

> I checked that arm64 is the only architecture that has this
> particular bug, and I tried building kselftest now, which seems
> to work better. There are still a few warnings and errors
> I get doing that, but I suspect those are all preexisting
> issues.

Yeah, not everything there builds cleanly (and there's a bunch of
external deps you need for many of the suites).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux