On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 9:05 PM Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Does this make sense? Implementation-wise, if you think it is simpler or more clear/elegant to have the extra lower level layer, then that sounds fine. However, I was mainly talking about what we would eventually expose to users, i.e. do we want to provide `Atomic<T>` to begin with? If yes, then we could make the lower layer private already. We can defer that extra layer/work if needed even if we go for `Atomic<T>`, but it would be nice to understand if we have consensus for an eventual user-facing API, or if someone has any other opinion or concerns on one vs. the other. Cheers, Miguel
