Re: [PATCH v6 00/37] Memory allocation profiling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 1:01 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 08:39:37AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 8:26 PM Kent Overstreet
> > <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 06:59:01PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 09:36:22AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > > Low overhead [1] per-callsite memory allocation profiling. Not just for
> > > > > debug kernels, overhead low enough to be deployed in production.
> > > >
> > > > Okay, I think I'm holding it wrong. With next-20240424 if I set:
> > > >
> > > > CONFIG_CODE_TAGGING=y
> > > > CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING=y
> > > > CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT=y
> > > >
> > > > My test system totally freaks out:
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > > SLUB: HWalign=64, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=4, Nodes=1
> > > > Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xc388d881e4808550: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> > > > CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-next-20240424 #1
> > > > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
> > > > RIP: 0010:__kmalloc_node_noprof+0xcd/0x560
> > > >
> > > > Which is:
> > > >
> > > > __kmalloc_node_noprof+0xcd/0x560:
> > > > __slab_alloc_node at mm/slub.c:3780 (discriminator 2)
> > > > (inlined by) slab_alloc_node at mm/slub.c:3982 (discriminator 2)
> > > > (inlined by) __do_kmalloc_node at mm/slub.c:4114 (discriminator 2)
> > > > (inlined by) __kmalloc_node_noprof at mm/slub.c:4122 (discriminator 2)
> > > >
> > > > Which is:
> > > >
> > > >         tid = READ_ONCE(c->tid);
> > > >
> > > > I haven't gotten any further than that; I'm EOD. Anyone seen anything
> > > > like this with this series?
> > >
> > > I certainly haven't. That looks like some real corruption, we're in slub
> > > internal data structures and derefing a garbage address. Check kasan and
> > > all that?
> >
> > Hi Kees,
> > I tested next-20240424 yesterday with defconfig and
> > CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING enabled but didn't see any issue like that.
> > Could you share your config file please?
>
> Well *that* took a while to .config bisect. I probably should have found
> it sooner, but CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y is what broke me. Without that,
> everything is lovely! :)
>
> I can reproduce it now with:
>
> $ make defconfig kvm_guest.config
> $ ./scripts/config -e CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING -e CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK

Thanks! I'll use this to reproduce the issue and will see if we can
handle that recursion in a better way.

>
> -Kees
>
> --
> Kees Cook





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux