RE: [PATCH 1/1] x86/hyperv: Use Hyper-V entropy to seed guest random number generator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx @ 2024-03-04  6:57 UTC
> 
> > +void __init ms_hyperv_late_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct acpi_table_header *header;
> > +	acpi_status status;
> > +	u8 *randomdata;
> > +	u32 length, i;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Seed the Linux random number generator with entropy provided by
> > +	 * the Hyper-V host in ACPI table OEM0.  It would be nice to do this
> > +	 * even earlier in ms_hyperv_init_platform(), but the ACPI subsystem
> > +	 * isn't set up at that point. Skip if booted via EFI as generic EFI
> > +	 * code has already done some seeding using the EFI RNG protocol.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) || efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	status = acpi_get_table("OEM0", 0, &header);
> > +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !header) {
> > +		pr_info("Hyper-V: ACPI table OEM0 not found\n");
> 
> I would like this to be a pr_debug() instead of pr_info(), considering
> using the negative case may cause users to think not having this table
> can be problematic.
> 
> Alternatively, we can remove this message here, and then ...
> 
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> 
> ... add a pr_debug() here to indicate that the table was found.
> 
> 	pr_info("Hyper-V: Seeding randomness with data from ACPI table OEM0\n");

You wrote the code as "pr_info()" but your comment suggests "pr_debug()".
I'm assuming pr_debug() is better because we don't really need any output
on success or failure. If trying to debug something related to the rng,
even with no explicit output it's relatively easy to tell whether a Gen1 VM
picked up any entropy from the OEM0 table.  When it does, this dmesg
line will appear much earlier than when it does not.

[    0.000000] random: crng init done

I'll spin a v2 with this tweak and your wording comment on the
commit message.

Michael

> 
> Dexuan, Saurabh, Haiyang and Long, can you give an ack or nack to this
> patch and help test it?
> 
> Thanks,
> Wei.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux