Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] modules: few of alignment fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 12:20:38AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 3:05 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:11:44PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:26:39AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > > Masahiro, if there no issues feel free to take this or I can take them in
> > > > too via the modules-next tree. Lemme know!
> > >
> > > I've queued this onto modules-testing to get winder testing [0]
> >
> > I've moved it to modules-next as I've found no issues.
> >
> >   Luis
> 
> 
> I believe this patch series is wrong.
> 
> I thought we agreed that the alignment must be added to
> individual asm code, not to the linker script.
>
> I am surprised that you came back to this.

I misseed the dialog on the old cover letter, sorry. I've yanked these patches
out. I'd expect a respin from Helge.

  Luis




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux