Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] dax: Check for data cache aliasing at runtime

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-02-01 10:44, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
On 2024-01-31 17:18, Dan Williams wrote:

[...]


diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
index 5f1be1da92ce..11053a70f5ab 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
  #include <linux/fs_context.h>
  #include <linux/fs_parser.h>
  #include <linux/highmem.h>
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
  #include <linux/uio.h>
  #include "fuse_i.h"
@@ -795,8 +796,11 @@ static void virtio_fs_cleanup_dax(void *data)
      put_dax(dax_dev);
  }
+DEFINE_FREE(cleanup_dax, struct dax_dev *, if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_T)) virtio_fs_cleanup_dax(_T))
+
  static int virtio_fs_setup_dax(struct virtio_device *vdev, struct virtio_fs *fs)

So either I'm completely missing how ownership works in this function, or
we should be really concerned about the fact that it does no actual
cleanup of anything on any error.
[...]

Here what I'm seeing so far:

- devm_release_mem_region() is never called after devm_request_mem_region(). Not
   on error, neither on teardown,
- pgmap is never freed on error after devm_kzalloc.

I was indeed missing something: the devm_ family of functions
keeps ownership at the device level, so we would not need explicit
teardown.


  {
+    struct dax_device *dax_dev __free(cleanup_dax) = NULL;
      struct virtio_shm_region cache_reg;
      struct dev_pagemap *pgmap;
      bool have_cache;
@@ -804,6 +808,15 @@ static int virtio_fs_setup_dax(struct virtio_device *vdev, struct virtio_fs *fs)
      if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUSE_DAX))
          return 0;
+    dax_dev = alloc_dax(fs, &virtio_fs_dax_ops);
+    if (IS_ERR(dax_dev)) {
+        int rc = PTR_ERR(dax_dev);
+
+        if (rc == -EOPNOTSUPP)
+            return 0;
+        return rc;
+    }

What is gained by moving this allocation here ?

I'm still concerned about moving the call to alloc_dax() before
the setup of the memory region it will use. Are those completely
independent ?


+
      /* Get cache region */
      have_cache = virtio_get_shm_region(vdev, &cache_reg,
                         (u8)VIRTIO_FS_SHMCAP_ID_CACHE);
@@ -849,10 +862,7 @@ static int virtio_fs_setup_dax(struct virtio_device *vdev, struct virtio_fs *fs)       dev_dbg(&vdev->dev, "%s: window kaddr 0x%px phys_addr 0x%llx len 0x%llx\n",
          __func__, fs->window_kaddr, cache_reg.addr, cache_reg.len);
-    fs->dax_dev = alloc_dax(fs, &virtio_fs_dax_ops);
-    if (IS_ERR(fs->dax_dev))
-        return PTR_ERR(fs->dax_dev);
-
+    fs->dax_dev = no_free_ptr(dax_dev);
      return devm_add_action_or_reset(&vdev->dev, virtio_fs_cleanup_dax,
                      fs->dax_dev);
  }


[...]

Thanks,

Mathieu


--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux